Legal Opinion

Shirley M. Tucker, Cross-Appellant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1986No. 85-4453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

This case turns on the interpretation of a clause in an automobile insurance policy. The district court held that the clause in dispute reduced the uninsured motorist limit below that which Mississippi law requires, 609 F.Supp. 1574. We disagree with this interpretation of the policy and modify the compensatory damage award and reverse the award of punitive damages.

I

Shirley M. Tucker suffered injuries on January 8, 1983, in an automobile accident caused solely by an uninsured motorist. On that date, Mrs. Tucker was insured by Aetna Casualty & Surety Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gov. Emp. Ins. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Young v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Talbot v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawler v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Welborn v. State Farm Mtl AutoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Curry v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
  4. Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RamseyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API