Legal Opinion
Curry v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided November 22, 1989No. Civ. A. H87-0239(W)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions: a motion by the defendant, The Travelers Indemnity Company (hereinafter Travelers), for summary judgment and a cross-motion by the plaintiff, James Curry, also for summary judgment, both pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In this court pursuant to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, this lawsuit was originally filed in the Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, and removed to this court upon motion of the defendant. The plaintiff is an adult resident citizen of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Box v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Guardianship of LacyMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Gary P. Boatner Paula K. Boatner v. Atlanta Speciality Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. AshleyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.