Legal Opinion

Young v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1941No. 9808PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for a declaratory judgment, that the insurer was not obligated to defend suits under or liable on, a policy of automobile insurance it had issued to one Roy Young as insured. Appellee was the plaintiff. The defendants were the insured and one Brand, who had sued Young for damages growing out of an alleged collision between Young’s auto*878mobile and Brand’s motorcycle on January 20, 1940.

The claim was that though obligated by Clause 6, the Notice of Accident Clause,1 to give written notice to the company “as soon as practicable”, upon the occurrence of an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Lawrence v. MinturnSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Star of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Chapin v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. American Liberty Insurance Company v. SoulesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. The Greyhound Corporation v. Excess Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API