Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 9, 1992No. Civ. A. J91-0244(L)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TOM S. LEE, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs Alford Lee Thomas and Carol Thomas, as guardians of the Estate of Matthew Thomas, have responded to the motion and have moved for partial summary judgment on count 1 of their complaint. The court has considered the memoranda of authorities together with attachments submitted by the parties in connection with the motion, and is of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Gov. Emp. Ins. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wickline v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nationwide Insurance v. LadnerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API