Ferguson v. Gardner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
P laintiff, as a taxpayer, commenced an action against defendants, seeking certain relief to be herein more fully detailed. Defendants filed a general demurrer to the complaint, which demurrer was sustained by the court below and plaintiff was allowed ten days to amend. Plaintiff declined to amend, and, the time elapsing, a judgment was entered that plaintiff take nothing and that the relief sought be denied.
The question before us for review is on the sufficiency of the complaint as against a general demurrer.
The complaint alleges: That the plaintiff is a ' citizen,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Connelly v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waldorf v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Totten v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.