Legal Opinion
Fort v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1982No. Civ. 51215PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Appellant Joel Fort, M.D. (hereafter Dr. Fort) is a licensed physician specializing in the practice of psychiatry. He was accused and found guilty by respondent Board of Medical Quality Assurance (hereafter Board), under Business and Professions Code sections 2361 and 2411, of knowingly assisting others in making or sighing a certificate and document directly or indirectly related to the practice of medicine which falsely represented the existence or nonexistence of a state of facts. For the attending “unprofessional conduct” he was placed on probation for one year during…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re ByeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. LonerganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Foster v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.