Connelly v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. P. Langhorne, George W. Lane, and J. Delmore Lederman, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action brought under sections 3819 and 3804 of the Political Code to recover from defendant $1,446.42 taxes paid by property owners under protest, for which verified claims were filed with the board of supervisors seeking a refund. The taxes so paid were levied by the supervisors in the general levy of the city and county of San Francisco for municipal purposes for the fiscal year 1904^05. They were levied for the purpose of raising money wherewith to pay interest on and to provide a redemption fund for certain municipal bonds. The issuance of these bonds had been voted upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hellman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Dear v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.