Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.
This is one of five cases in which a claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits is made because of a mental condition allegedly arising out of claimant’s employment. 44 Or App 520, 605 P2d 1391 (1980).
The plaintiff is a male, age 55, who was working as a vocational counselor for the State of Oregon. Because of the conduct of his supervisor, including his methods of supervision, claimant contends he suffered a "personality disorder of the passive-aggressive type” which caused him to be unable to work for a period of about seven months. There was medical evidence that the conduct of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUNDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982