Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1981No. TC 1098, 1181, SC 26684Published

1Concurrence

*760TONGUE, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the opinion by the majority, but wish to make it clear that by my concurrence I do not acquiesce in the long delay of over 10 months after oral argument in the preparation of a proposed opinion for submission to this court for approval, not to speak of the delay of 12 months after oral argument in the final decision of this case.

At the recent annual meeting of the Oregon State Bar, Chief Justice Denecke, in his annual report as Chief Justice, stated that all members of this court are “concerned” about the length of the period between oral argument…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API