Legal Opinion

Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1980No. WCB 77-2861 CA 13840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 P.2d 1391 (1980)

In the matter of the Compensation of Charles MADDOX, Claimant, Respondent,

v.

STATE Accident Insurance Fund, Petitioner.

No. WCB 77-2861; CA 13840.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 16, 1979.

Decided February 19, 1980.

Darrell E. Bewley, Associate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem.

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dye & Olson, Salem.

Before SCHWAB,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Paresi v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Maddox v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API