Legal Opinion

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1983No. SC 29212, CA A23313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This workers’ compensation case presents the question whether the compensability of a claim must be determined finally before the extent of disability may be litigated. Specifically, SAIF Corporation asks this court to determine whether the Workers’ Compensation Board and its referees have jurisdiction to enter orders rating extent of disability where the condition of claimant previously has been found to be compensable but that issue is the subject of a pending appeal.

This case has been in litigation since May, 1977. 1 Because of the protracted litigation the issue of compensability had not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUNDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Maddox v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ex Parte Lumbermen's Underwriting AllianceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Providence Health System v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Price v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Southwest Forest Industries v. AndersOregon Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API