Legal Opinion
Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 26, 1986No. Court No. 82-4-00525PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
*198(Decided March 26, 1986) Fitch, King and Caffentzis (Richard C. King and Peter Fitch) for the plaintiff. Richard K. Willard, Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division (Barbara Epstein ) for the defendant. Carman, Judge:
This case involves the proper tariff classification of "bell jars,” otherwise described by plaintiff as "large, tubular articles, made of fused silica,” with "[o]ne end * * * closed, in approximately hemispherical shape, and the other * * * open.” The United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Ball v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nestle Refrigerated Food Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989