Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Defendant moved under Rule 56 of the Rules of this Court for summary judgment, which would have denied plaintiff s claim that the imported merchandise should have been classified differently and sustained the original classification. At oral argument held on September 19, 1989, this Court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, stating that there appeared to be material questions of fact involved in the instant case.
*765Background and Facts
Plaintiff is the importer of record of the merchandise it describes as Rotosil opaque fused quartz round tubes with one end…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Heraeus Amersil, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987