Legal Opinion

Nestle Refrigerated Food Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 20, 1994No. Court No. 92-07-00445PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Goldberg, Judge:

This matter is before the court following trial de novo. The question presented is the proper tariff classification of a canned tomato product imported from Spain, and entered into the United States on February 24,1992. The United States Customs Service *662(“Customs”) classified the product at issue as “tomatoes, whole or in pieces” under heading 2002.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1992), and assessed a duty of 100 percent ad valorem in conjunction with subheading 9903.23.17, HTSUS. Plaintiff, Nestle Refrigerated Food Co.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API