Nestle Refrigerated Food Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Goldberg, Judge:
This matter is before the court following trial de novo. The question presented is the proper tariff classification of a canned tomato product imported from Spain, and entered into the United States on February 24,1992. The United States Customs Service *662(“Customs”) classified the product at issue as “tomatoes, whole or in pieces” under heading 2002.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1992), and assessed a duty of 100 percent ad valorem in conjunction with subheading 9903.23.17, HTSUS. Plaintiff, Nestle Refrigerated Food Co.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998