Legal Opinion

McPhail v. United States

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 27, 1976No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 75-22PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

The Government contends that this Court has no authority to relieve the petitioner from the burdens of a conviction by a court-martial which could not, constitutionally, exercise jurisdiction over the offenses with which he was charged.

The charges against the accused were referred to a special court-martial to which Major P. B. Herron, a military judge, had been detailed. So constituted, the court-martial was authorized, in the event of conviction, to impose a punitive discharge. Article 19, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 819. On April 2, 1975,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. Unger v. ZiemniakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API