Legal Opinion

Unger v. Ziemniak

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 27, 1989No. Misc. No. 89-05PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

In August 1988, Lieutenant Unger was charged with willfully disobeying the lawful order of a superior commissioned officer that she comply with a Naval directive — OPNAV Instruction 5350.4A — by giving a urine sample under direct observation by a female enlisted servicemember. See Art. 90, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 890. After a pretrial investigation had been conducted pursuant to Article 32 of the Code, 10 USC § 832, the charge was referred for trial by a special court-martial.

After arraignment, Lieutenant Unger made several motions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Goldman v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. BickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. Waller v. SwiftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. James R. Matias v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. U.S. ex rel New, M. v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API