Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. United Equitable Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2001No. 20000333PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Frank Rose appealed from a judgment 1 dismissing his action against Standard Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Standard”), United Equitable Insurance Company (“United”), and United Equitable Life Insurance Company. 2 We conclude the district court, relying on the statute of limitations, erred in dismissing Rose’s action on the pleadings, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

[¶ 2] Rose, who was born in 1906, bought a long term care insurance policy from United in 1982. United later assigned all its North Dakota long term care policies to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells v. First American Bank WestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Towne v. DiniusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnson & Maxwell, Ltd. v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. RunckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. Hansen v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ziegelmann v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rakes v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API