Legal Opinion
Ziegelmann v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2002No. 20020041PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Terry Ziegelmann, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated, appealed from a judgment dismissing with prejudice his putative class action lawsuit against DaimlerChrysler Corporation for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because Ziegelmann has not pled a legally cognizable injury, we conclude the trial court did not err in dismissing the complaint. We therefore affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In July 2001, Ziegelmann brought this action on behalf of himself and a purported class of North Dakota owners of model year 1991 through 2000 vehicles…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Joe Church, Gregory Jacobs, Michael Dooly, and Frank Chisom v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Helen W. ANGUS, Appellant, v. SHILEY INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Peners L. Griffin and Henry L. Dejerinett v. Richard L. Dugger, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Alfred Brown, William King and Willie James Mallett, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert R. Sibley, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Vandall v. Trinity HospitalsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.