Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Scott

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2002No. 20010195PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michelle Hansen, individually and as personal representative of the estates of Gordon and Barbara Erickstad, and Stacey Hansen, the Erickstads’ daughters, (“daughters”) appeal from a partial judgment dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction their wrongful death, survivorship, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“Texas defendants”). We hold the daughters’ claims against the Texas defendants state a prima facie tort under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2)(C), and the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the Texas defendants…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Panircelvan Kaliannan v. Ee LiangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Citizens State Bank-Midwest v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Mary Elizabeth Santelli, as Administrator of the Estate of James F. Santelli v. Abu M. Rahmatullah, Individually and d/b/a Super 8 MotelIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API