Legal Opinion

Haigler v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1987No. 85-735, 85-1141PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellant argues that his convictions on two counts of armed robbery 1 must be reversed, and the indictment against him dismissed, because his right to an expedited trial under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD or Act), D.C.Code §§ 24-701 et seq. (1981), was violated. We agree with appellant’s contention, and dismiss the indictment pursuant to Article V(c) of the IAD. 2

I

In an indictment filed August 9, 1983, appellant was charged with six armed robberies that occurred over a one week period near the end of March, 1983. Appellant’s arraignment on those…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WilloughbyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State of Maine v. Christopher ShepardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API