Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1988No. 15724PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Danny Floyd Cooper (Cooper) appeals a conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. He claims the charge should have been dismissed because of a violation of the 180-day rule (SDCL 23A-44-5.1).

Facts

Cooper was arrested by Trooper Roger Wermers on August 1, 1985 in McCook County on a charge of driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages. Trooper Wermers spotted the Cooper vehicle when it veered off the edge of the road and drove on the unpaved shoulder before entering a service station. When Trooper Wermers stopped the vehicle, he found Mrs. Cooper in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Dennis Allen Brown v. Charles L. Wolff, and Richard H. Bryan, Attorney-General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. BondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WimberlySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SorensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API