Legal Opinion
Grant v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 2004No. 97-CF-866, 00-CO-1655, 01-CO-364PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted Anthony W. Grant in 1996 of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. See D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1981), re-codified at D.C.Code § 48-904.01(a)(1) (2001). He asks us to reverse his conviction and dismiss the charge with prejudice on the ground that his statutory right to a speedy trial under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers was violated. See D.C.Code § 24-701 (1991), re-codified at D.C.Code § 24-801 (2001). After studying the record, we conclude that the agreement does not apply to the trial of the particular charge at issue in this appeal. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Dotson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.