Legal Opinion
United States v. Jordan
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided August 22, 1975No. 29,592PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fletcher, Chief Judge:
The issues in this case concern the admissibility of the fruits of a search and seizure and of statements made by the accused when confronted with the results of the search. The Government maintains the search was legal because it was done with the freely obtained consent of the accused and that, in any event, the search was conducted solely by British police officers in connection with a British police investigation. The accused, on the other hand, contends he did not consent to the search but merely acquiesced in a police assertion of authority and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. DeLeoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. JusticeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. John L. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert Conroy, Raymond Dahl, Frederick Jacobs and Walter K. Schubert, United States of America v. Leonard A. Walker, A/K/A "Silver"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TannerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.