Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. DeLeo

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 26, 1954No. 4194PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

This case is before us on petition, and presents a problem in the law of search and seizure. The accused, DeLeo, was tried by a general court-martial sitting at La Rochelle, France, for forgery, in violation of Article 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 717. The single specification alleged that he falsely, and with intent to defraud, endorsed the signature of Andrew D. Binz on fifteen American Express Company, United States dollar travelers checks, in the total amount of $200.00. He pleaded not guilty, but was found guilty as charged,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. StuckeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. JusticeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API