Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 12, 1976No. 29,592PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

Following the release of our initial opinion in this case, the Government filed a timely petition for reconsideration1 urging that we reexamine the exclusionary rule promulgated by the majority “that evidence obtained by search and seizure in a foreign country must meet Fourth Amendment standards in order to be admitted in evidence in a trial by court-martial, regardless of whether it . [was] obtained by foreign police acting on their own or in *336conjunction with American authorities.” United States v. Jordan, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 525, 527, 50 C.M.R. 664, 666,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. MorrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API