United States v. Jordan
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
Following the release of our initial opinion in this case, the Government filed a timely petition for reconsideration1 urging that we reexamine the exclusionary rule promulgated by the majority “that evidence obtained by search and seizure in a foreign country must meet Fourth Amendment standards in order to be admitted in evidence in a trial by court-martial, regardless of whether it . [was] obtained by foreign police acting on their own or in *336conjunction with American authorities.” United States v. Jordan, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 525, 527, 50 C.M.R. 664, 666,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. MorrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.