United States v. Tanner
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COSTELLO, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a military jury of possessing about 10 grams of heroin in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. His sentence includes confinement at hard labor for three years, but he was tried before United States v. Courtney was decided and derives no benefit from that decision. 1 M.J. 438 (C.M.A. 1976); United States v. Jackson, 3 M.J. 101 (C.M.A. 1977).
He is attacking the receipt into evidence of that heroin seized by German police from his wife’s purse after the auto in which they were riding was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. DeLeoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. RoettgerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. MorrisonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. SpencerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.