Legal Opinion

Hibbard v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 5870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; John I-I. Pitchford, Judge. Action by Harry Hibbard against John Ford and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled" the plaintiff, in the district court of Cherokee county, against; the defendants in error, hereinafter styled the defendants, to recover upon two promissory notes, each for the sum of $90, and to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real es tate in Cherokee county given by defendants to secure the payment of said notes. The case was tided to the court, resulting in a judgment for the defendants. Plaintiff filed his motion for new trial, which being overruled, he brings this proceeding in error to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Levy v. GrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. PappanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Porter v. WoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Goss v. Sorrell Et Vir.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swearingen v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Redwine v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Jack Stein, an Individual v. Dan W. James, Ruby G. James, George W. James, and Danny R. HightowerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Brinton v. MaxeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API