Legal Opinion
Redwine v. Cummins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1923No. 10976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER,
J. W. N. Redwine instituted this action i,n the district court of Pittsburg county against J. W. Cummins and A. A. Cravens to recover $500 alleged to he duel upon a promissory note executed by the defendants in favor of the plaintiff on August 22, 1917, and for the foreclosure of a mortgage given on the same date to secure thel payment of said note. The defense of the defendants in substance was that the note was executed by the defendants in consideration of an agreement on the part of the plaintiff to represent the defendants upon a criminal charge for having resisted the draft…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Byrd & Co. v. Marietta Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Bank of California v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Faux v. FitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Boynton v. TwittySupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haunstein v. McCalisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Inter-City Finance Corp. v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Moore v. La Salle Extension UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Jones v. American Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Stapleton v. RathbunSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952