Legal Opinion

Brinton v. Maxey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1916No. 4855Published

Error from District Court, Atoka County; R. M. Rainey, Judge. Action by George M. Maxey and wife against Wilder S. Metcalf, and Mary H. Brinton intervenes. Judgment for plaintiffs, and intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WILSON, C.

On February 13, 1911, one Teubner was, and had been for some time prior thereto, cashier of the Tushka Bank at Tushka, Atoka county, Okla. For some time prior to that date Wilder S. Metcalf, of Lawrence, Kan., had been making a large number of loans in Atoka county, applications for which had been sent to him by Teubner or Teubner & Lankford.

Prior to February 13, 1911, Teubner had repeatedly approached George M. Maxey, one 'of the defendants in error, trying to persuade him to take a loan on his farm near Tushka with Metcalf. Later Metcalf went to Tushka and was introduced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockton v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  2. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. PappanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Hibbard v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API