Legal Opinion

King v. Remington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1886PublishedCited by 53 opinions

These actions were brought in the district court for Hennepin county, against Philo Eemington and his wife, Louis P. Menage and his wife, and Eobert S. Innes, and were tried together by Young and Koon, JJ., without a jury. In each ease a judgment was ordered for plaintiff, a new trial was refused, and the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

These two eases grew out of the same transactions, and depend on the same condition of facts, and may be disposed of in the same opinion. The cases are very voluminous, and have been voluminously (and exhaustively) argued. The record in each case covers over 800 printed pages, and the briefs or arguments in both cases (they were argued together) cover 1,100 printed pages.

The facts, stating them as briefly as can be done and present the questions decided, are: On and prior to June 15, 1875, William S. King owned large quantities of land of great value in the counties of Hennepin and Meeker, in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Van Epps v. Van EppsNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Burton v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Backus v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
  4. St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API