Legal Opinion
Oil Well Supply Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1935No. Civ. 10483PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition against the superior court to prevent it from hearing the account of a trustee of a private trust and making an order thereon. The facts as we shall state them are undisputed.
A number of years ago Wigle & McBride, l’nc., a corporation, executed a trust agreement for the benefit of its creditors, of which petitioner is one. L. T. McCutcheon, Harold A. Gilman and Frank H. Madden were named as trustees, and administered the property of the trust for some time. On March 10, 1930, each of the three trustees had either died or resigned. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. McManus v. MuenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- In Re HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- White v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landis v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Bauer v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935