Legal Opinion

White v. Patton

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1890No. 12879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court-

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Proceeding for foreclosure of mortgage. Defendants Patton, the mortgagors, made default, but the defendant Thomson, who was alleged to make some claim as a subsequent mortgagee, answered, setting up a junior mortgage made by the same mortgagors, and prayed that after the satisfaction of plaintiff’s mortgage the proceeds of sale should be applied to the payment of the amount due upon such junior mortgage, and for judgment for deficiency, if any there should be, against the Pattons. The court rendered judgment accordingly, and the Pattons appeal.

Appellants claim that the answer of Thomson was…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pousson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Culmer v. Hooper-CaineUtah Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API