Legal Opinion
Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2004No. CIV.A.01-0781(RBW)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”), which was filed following the issuance of this Court’s decision in Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.Supp.2d 191 (D.D.C.2002), granting in part and denying in part the defendant’s motions for partial dismissal of the plaintiffs complaint. In that Memorandum Opinion, this Court dismissed the plaintiffs claims for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2401-680 (2000), and denied the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- McIntyre v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Laurent v. Bureau of Rehabilitation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wada v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.