Commonwealth v. Payne
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
This case involves the question of whether the identity of a witness to a crime, where the witness also informed against Appellant, Anthony Allen Payne, at an earlier point in time, must be revealed to the defense at the price of dismissing the charges if it is not done. Under the following facts, we hold that the witness’s identity must be revealed or the prosecution dropped.
Appellant was convicted under the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act1 with delivery of cocaine and possession with intent to deliver,2 and possession.3 The facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. IannaccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.