Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1998No. 77 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether appellant should be granted a new trial where the trial court refused to order the Commonwealth to disclose to appellant the identity of a confidential informant involved in one of appellant’s drug transactions. We affirm the order of the Superior Court and hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to order the Commonwealth to identify the informant.

The relevant facts are as follows: In conjunction with the Franklin County Drug Task Force, the Pennsylvania State Police conducted undercover…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. HerronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BelenkySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. EllisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API