Commonwealth v. Carter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Pennsylvania decisions have long recognized that in criminal trials the prosecution is not absolutely bound to call to the stand all available and material eyewitnesses. Commonwealth ex rel. Sprangle v. Maroney, 423 Pa. 589, 225 A. 2d 236 (1967); Commonwealth v. Horn, 395 Pa. 585, 150 A. 2d 872 (1959); Commonwealth v. Palermo, 368 Pa. 28, 81 A. 2d 540 (1951); Commonwealth v. Deitrick, 221 Pa. 7, 70 Atl. 275 (1908). On the other hand, a number of decisions clearly indicate that when the Commonwealth does not call to the stand such an eyewitness, it must apprise…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. TolassiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.