Commonwealth v. Miller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.*
The issue that confronts us here is whether in a criminal case the Commonwealth, on the ground of protecting the anonymity and safety of a confidential informant, has the right to exclude defense counsel from an in camera inquiry into the veracity of search-warrant recitals alleging the past reliability of the informant.
On April 19, 1982, two men robbed Korman’s Discount Store on Ridge Avenue in Philadelphia, and fled with several thousand dollars worth of jewelry from the establishment. During the robbery one of the men had brandished a shotgun. The next day,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.