Garza v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Presiding Judge.
This matter can be categorized as “the case of the multiple notices of claim status.” The two main issues for our consideration are the finality of the determination of the average monthly wage and the effect of the carrier’s 11 March 1971 notice of suspension of benefits. In view of our opinion that the award must be set aside, we do not answer all of the potential questions. After an award has been set aside by an appellate court the claim is presented as a trial de novo and new evidence may be introduced. Rutledge v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 108 Ariz. 61,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hanen v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Vazzano v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Vinyard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Verdugo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Edmunds v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Glover v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Godfrey v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Chavez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Garza v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.