Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 4, 1979No. 1 CA-IC 2100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

Petitioner’s workmen’s compensation benefits were unilaterally suspended by the respondent carrier during the period of her pregnancy and she has instituted this special action to challenge the hearing officer’s finding that the Notice of Suspension of Benefits issued by the carrier was not void. We are of the opinion that the notice suspending petitioner’s benefits during the period of her pregnancy was void. The award is set aside.

Petitioner injured her back and right ankle in an industrial accident on September 11, 1975. Her claim for workmen’s compensation benefits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Bearden v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Roseberry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Garza v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Nelson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Edmunds v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Jardanowski v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Velez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Asarco Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API