Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1980No. 1 CA-IC 2213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The question in this Industrial Commission special action is whether a carrier may suspend benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1026(C) when a workmen’s compensation claimant fails to attend a medical examination because the claimant, due to errors in the postal delivery system that are beyond his control, did not receive notice of the scheduled examination.

Petitioner, employee James B. Edmunds, sustained an industrially-related back injury in 1976. His workmen’s compensation claim was accepted for benefits and eventually closed with no permanent impairment in May of 1977.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garza v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Stemkowski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Godfrey v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Mueller v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Israel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Kwietkauski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Nolden v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Velez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Israel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API