Legal Opinion

Waschek v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1997No. B095356PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

We hold that the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is not liable to a party injured by a licensed driver (Gov. Code, § 818.4) 1 when DMV had determined the driver was able “to safely operate a motor vehicle upon a highway.” (Veh. Code, § 12805, subd. (c).) 2

Factual and Procedural Background

On August 19, 1990, 96-year-old Emanuel Schlesinger sought renewal of his driver’s license. He was examined and tested by Phillip Marcus, a DMV driver’s license examiner with 20 years’ experience. Mr. Schlesinger presented to Mr. Marcus a report of an August 10, 1990,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Di Loreto, Inc. v. O'NEILLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Malo v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Papelian v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Trewin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Gray v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Claudio v. Regents of University of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Christoff v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Mills v. U.S. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Dawson v. ToledanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API