Legal Opinion

Joseph E. Di Loreto, Inc. v. O'NEILL

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1991No. B050445PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Defendant Ann M. O’Neill appeals from summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Joseph E. Di Loreto, Inc., a professional law corporation, and Joseph E. Di Loreto (Di Loreto) for the amount of $313,666.73 plus costs on Di Loreto’s claim against O’Neill for breach of a written employment agreement.

Factual and Procedural Background

We set out only the allegations of the first amended complaint for breach of contract (second cause of action), Di Loreto’s remaining causes of action against O’Neill having been dismissed prior to entry of the summary judgment on the second cause of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wagner v. Glendale Adventist Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Estate of FalcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Pultz v. HolgersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Lopez v. BacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Wiz Technology, Inc. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Waschek v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Granadino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API