Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Toledano

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 2003No. G029927PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

A personal injury plaintiff, himself an attorney, was sanctioned for prosecuting a frivolous appeal. He immediately filed a malpractice action against the attorney who had represented him in the appeal, contending an attorney who prosecutes a frivolous appeal thereby commits malpractice per se. The trial court agreed, and entered summary judgment against the appellate practitioner.

The appellate practitioner appeals. He argues the trial court erred in applying res judicata and collateral estoppel principles so as to preclude him from asserting that the appeal was not frivolous…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Jenkins v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Rodgers v. Sargent Controls & AerospaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Ambriz v. KelegianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Martorana v. Marlin & SaltzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API