Legal Opinion

Malo v. Willis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1981No. Civ. 25024PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a California highway patrolman’s personal injury action is barred by the fireman’s rule. After the motion of defendant Ray Eugene'Willis for summary judgment was granted, plaintiffs Michael John Malo and the State of California moved for reconsideration. The trial court granted reconsideration, vacated a judgment entered while the reconsideration motion was pending, and denied the summary judgment motion. Defendant appeals.

Defendant’s moving papers included the deposition testimony of plaintiff Malo, from which the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Scott v. E. L. Yeager Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Green v. Del-Camp Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Flowers v. Rock Creek Terrace Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API