Home Savings Bank v. Bentley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The issues on this appeal are:(1) Did the fact, that the plaintiff filed an affidavit setting forth the evidentiary facts in connection with its cashing of the check and the sole affidavit filed in opposition thereto contained no evidentiary facts, require that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted against all three defendants?(2) Did the trial court possess the right to enter summary judgment in behalf of the plaintiff as to any of the defendants if the plaintiff were found not to be entitled to such judgment against all of them?(3) Did the delay of eight days which occurred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Laughnan v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Scharine v. HuebschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Hermann v. City of Lake MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson v. ElemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Jefferson Gardens, Inc. v. TerzanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Weber v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Clark v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Knickerbocker Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.