Scharine v. Huebsch

No complaint is made by appellant of the findings of the jury that he was negligent and the plaintiff ■not negligent. He contends that the damages are excessive and that a new trial should be awarded on this ground. He *264also claims that the driver of the towed truck was guilty of concurring negligence as matter of law and that he should have judgment against his codefendant for contribution if the judgment for the plaintiff stands. Error is also claimed and a new trial asked because of alleged error of the court in instructing regarding conduct in an emergency and because of a remark made by…