Legal Opinion

Hermann v. City of Lake Mills

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The city having decided that the parcel in question was no longer needed for park purposes, secs. 62.22 (1) and 62.23 (17) (b), Stats., authorized it to make sale of such property. In making sale of such parcel, the council was not required to solicit bids and sell to the highest bidder, and, therefore, necessarily is vested with considerable discretion in the matter.

The defendants contend that, if the council acted in good faith in making the instant sale to the corporation in the belief that this was in the best interests of the city, such exercise of discretion is beyond the power of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Laughnan v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Quackenbush v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fredrickson v. KabatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Village of Suring v. Suring State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. City of Kiel v. Frank Shoe Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Scanlon v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Bowman v. BarczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Town of Beloit v. County of RockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Glendale Development, Inc. v. Board of Regents of the University of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API