Legal Opinion
Hottenstein v. York Ice Machinery Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 29, 1944No. 8097PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner asks leave of this court to file a complaint in the nature of a bill of review in the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware. The petitioner owns shares of the 7% cumulative preferred stock of York Ice Machinery Corporation. He brought a suit in the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware seeking to enjoin a merger of York Ice Machinery Corporation with a wholly owned and inactive subsidiary pursuant to Section 59 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, Section 2091, Revised Code 1935, designed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Hottenstein v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Hottenstein v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Production Co. v. SabathSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Root v. York Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Lewald v. York Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946