Legal Opinion
Hottenstein v. York Ice MacHinery Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 8, 1942No. Civil Action 205PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
This suit was brought to prevent the merger of the defendant with the York Corporation and for injunctive relief.
The defendant was organized under the laws of Delaware in 1927, and its outstanding stock consists of approximately 53,000 shares of preferred stock and 161,000 shares of common stock. In January of 1941 a plan was proposed to merge the defendant and its wholly owned inactive subsidiary, York Corporation. York Corporation was organized under the laws of Delaware in 1939 to pre-empt the name which it bears for the defendant, and had no other assets except the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- MacFarlane v. North American Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Shanik v. White Sewing Machine CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
- Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Hottenstein v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
- Bruce v. E. L. Bruce Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.