Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:
The proposed merger of defendant and its wholly owned subsidiary is designed to bring about a recapitalization of defendant. The questions here concern the relative changes in the rights of the holders of defendant’s two classes of stock; preferred and common. Complainant charges that the changes are so unfair and inequitable to the preferred stockholders that the consummation of the merger should be enjoined.
*129Defendant has outstanding (or issuable for capital stock of predecessor companies) 21,160 shares of preferred stock, and 1,015,913 shares of common stock. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Cole v. National Cash Credit Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
- MacFarlane v. North American Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Otis & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kaplan v. Centex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.