Legal Opinion

Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 17, 1943PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, Vice-Chancellor:

The proposed merger of defendant and its wholly owned subsidiary is designed to bring about a recapitalization of defendant. The questions here concern the relative changes in the rights of the holders of defendant’s two classes of stock; preferred and common. Complainant charges that the changes are so unfair and inequitable to the preferred stockholders that the consummation of the merger should be enjoined.

*129Defendant has outstanding (or issuable for capital stock of predecessor companies) 21,160 shares of preferred stock, and 1,015,913 shares of common stock. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. Cole v. National Cash Credit Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. MacFarlane v. North American Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  5. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Otis & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Kaplan v. Centex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  5. Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API